The effect of increased resolving power was therefore further studied in MALDI-profiles obtained by Fourier transform ion cyclotron resonance (FTICR) MS, a platform that has
proven to be extremely powerful for the analysis of complex mixtures, such RG7204 molecular weight as oil, organic matter and plasma [21], [22] and [23]. With proper control, mass resolving powers higher than 100,000 (at m/z-value 1000 with 1 s transient) and low or sub-ppm mass measurement errors can be routinely obtained [24] and [25]. We have previously developed a MALDI-FTICR workflow on a commercially available platform equipped with a 15 T magnet that allows high-throughput and fully automated profiling of human serum peptides and proteins with isotopic resolution up to 15,000 Da [26] and [27]. By following this approach, in comparison to high resolution TOF analyzers the spectrum alignment Androgen Receptor antagonist is more accurate and the quantification of peptides more robust due to the improved mass measurement precision. In this study this MALDI-FTICR workflow in combination with SPE-based sample cleanup with RPC18-functionalized MBs was applied for the analysis of a clinical cohort. Here, “next-generation” MALDI-FTICR peptide and protein profiles were generated using serum samples obtained from PC patients
and control individuals (258 samples in total). Classification performances of both the calibration and validation set were compared to those previously obtained from the same PC cohort, either processed with different MBs or measured on a different mass analyzer. Discriminating peaks (i.e. a biomarker signature) defined from the calibration set were validated using an independent case–control group. Finally, the low ppm mass accuracy provided by the MALDI-FTICR platform narrows the search window for de novo identifications of peptides and proteins in the profiles. For the calibration set, serum samples were obtained from 49 patients with PC Orotidine 5′-phosphate decarboxylase prior to surgery, and from 110 (age- and gender-matched) healthy volunteers (“controls”) over a time period ranging from October 2002 until December 2008 at the outpatient clinic of
the Leiden University Medical Center (LUMC), the Netherlands. Healthy volunteers were partners or accompanying persons of included patients. For the validation set, serum samples were obtained from 39 patients and 75 healthy (age- and gender-matched) volunteers over a time period ranging from January 2009 until July 2010. Patients were selected candidates for curative surgery, thus no patients with primary irresectable tumors were included. All surgical specimens were examined according to routine histological evaluation and the extent of the tumor spread was assessed by TNM (TNM Classification of Malignant Tumors) classification. Informed consent was obtained from all subjects and the study was approved by the Medical Ethical Committee of the LUMC.