Second, many amacrine cells—perhaps a majority of the total numbe

Second, many amacrine cells—perhaps a majority of the total number—perform MK-8776 nmr some variety of vertical integration (the term is meant to contrast with lateral integration, as carried out by horizontal and wide-field amacrine cells). Only a small fraction of the 13 narrow field amacrine cell types found by MacNeil et al. (1999) were restricted to branching in narrow strata; the rest

communicate among several, sometimes all, of the layers of the IPL, like the cell shown in Figure 5. This means that they carry ON information into the OFF strata, and vice versa. This is termed crossover (for the crossing between ON and OFF layers) inhibition (because amacrine cells release GABA or glycine). It is the subject of very active investigation, which reveals a variety of interesting controls on the flow of information through the retina. The details are beyond the scope of this review, but an example is the finding

that some “excitatory” responses of ganglion cells to light are actually a release of amacrine mediated inhibition (Buldyrev et al., 2012; Demb and Singer, 2012; Farajian et al., 2011; Grimes et al., 2011; Molnar et al., 2009; BIBW2992 Nobles et al., 2012; Sivyer et al., 2010; Werblin, 2010). Third, most of the functions of amacrine cells are narrowly task-specific. An example is amacrine cell A17, a widely spreading neuron that places hundreds of electrotonically isolated synaptic boutons in contact with the output sites of the rod bipolar cell. At those points, the amacrine cell feeds back an inhibitory signal that improves the fidelity of information transmission by the rod bipolar

cell (Grimes et al., 2010; Sandell et al., 1989). This is the A17 cell’s primary, perhaps sole, task: and the A17 amacrine is in any case irrelevant to events that happen under daylight conditions. Another highly specialized amacrine cell, recently discovered in the ground squirrel retina, creates a specific receptive field property in a single type of ganglion cell (Chen and Li, 2012; Sher and DeVries, 2012). A blue-ON ganglion cell is well-known: it is excited by the blue-ON bipolar cell that selectively contacts blue cones. But electrophysiological recordings have encountered a blue-OFF ganglion cell, PDK4 inhibited when the stimulus lies at the short wavelength end of the spectrum. How can this happen if the only path through the retina is the blue-ON bipolar, carrying an excitatory signal? It turns out that a specific amacrine is driven directly by the blue-ON bipolar cell. The amacrine cell, like virtually all amacrine cells, is inhibitory to its postsynaptic partners. When excited by the blue-ON bipolar cell, this amacrine cell performs a sign inversion: it inhibits the ganglion cell upon which it synapses, thus creating a ganglion cell that is selective for blue stimuli and responds to a blue stimulus by slowing its firing—a blue-OFF ganglion cell. A final task-specific case is the role of the starburst amacrine cell.

This strategy requires tracking not only the expected values of c

This strategy requires tracking not only the expected values of candidate options, but also the relative uncertainties about them. In the present study, we used subject-specific, trial-by-trial estimates of relative uncertainty derived from a

computational model to show that RLPFC tracks relative uncertainty in those individuals who rely on this metric to explore. This result was robust across multiple variants of the model’s structure. In models of reinforcement learning, the predominant approach to exploration is to stochastically sample choices that do not have the highest expected value (e.g., Boltzmann “softmax” choice function; Sutton and Barto, 1998). This stochasticity is flexible: it increases when expected values of available options are similar, thereby increasing exploration. Moreover, the degree of stochasticity (the temperature

of the Veliparib in vitro softmax function) is thought to be under dynamic NVP-BGJ398 neuromodulatory control by cortical norepinephrine, perhaps as a function of reinforcement history (Cohen et al., 2007 and Frank et al., 2007). On the other hand, such regulatory mechanisms are only moderately strategic in that by effectively increasing noise, they are insensitive to the amount of information that could be gained by exploring one alternative action over another (indeed, a stochastic choice mechanism is equally likely to sample the exploited option). A more strategic approach is to direct exploration toward those options having the most uncertain reinforcement contingencies relative to the exploited option, so exploration optimizes the information gained. Whether the brain supports such directed, uncertainty-driven exploration has been understudied. Though MTMR9 prior fMRI studies have associated RLPFC with exploratory decision making (Daw et al., 2006), these data were suggestive of a more stochastic (undirected) approach to exploration, with no evidence for an uncertainty bonus. However, as already noted, this may have been due to

participants’ belief that contingencies were rapidly changing. In contrast, when contingencies were stationary within blocks of trials, Frank et al. (2009) reported evidence for an influence of uncertainty on exploratory response adjustments, and that individual differences in uncertainty-driven exploration were predicted by genetic variants affecting PFC function. However, though consistent with our hypothesis, these data did not demonstrate that the PFC tracks relative uncertainty during exploratory decisions. The present results fill this important gap and show that quantitative trial-by-trial estimates of relative uncertainty are correlated with signal change in RLPFC. Notably, the relative uncertainty effect in RLPFC was strongest in those participants who were estimated to rely on relative uncertainty to drive exploration.

, 1976, Brown et al , 1980b, Bryan et al , 1973, Craig, 1976, Ene

, 1976, Brown et al., 1980b, Bryan et al., 1973, Craig, 1976, Enevoldson and Gordon, 1989b, Hongo et al., 1968, Lundberg, 1964 and Taub and Bishop, 1965). On the basis of fiber and cell body counts, there are an estimated 4,000–6,000 SCT

neurons in the cat, with a much more even spread along the rostrocaudal extent in comparison to PSDC neurons, which seem to be concentrated Caspase inhibitor in cervical and lumbar enlargements. Most SCT neurons are located within lamina IV and have dorsally directed dendrites that terminate abruptly at the lamina II/III border. The majority have cone-shaped dendritic trees, with a few displaying more prominent ventral dendritic arborizations (Figure 4C). Like PSDC neurons, SCT neurons have axon collaterals that extend several segmental levels and may have local actions in spinal reflex pathways (Brown, 1981b). The neural components of the dorsal horn, which include presynaptic sensory inputs, locally projecting interneurons, descending modulatory inputs, and long-range projection neurons, are linked by a highly complex set of synaptic connections. Dorsal horn neurons not only receive synaptic input from primary afferents but also from neighboring excitatory

and inhibitory neurons, each with relative input strengths that most likely differ among modules of neuronal connections. Though our knowledge of dorsal horn circuit organization is still in its selleck inhibitor infancy, recently below gained genetic access

to both pre- and postsynaptic neurons will allow for modality-specific dissection of dorsal horn circuits. As with all primary afferents, LTMRs use glutamate as their principal fast transmitter; therefore, all LTMR subtypes have an excitatory action on their postsynaptic targets of the dorsal horn (Brumovsky et al., 2007 and Todd et al., 2003). However, synaptic arrangements between LTMR subtypes and their postsynaptic targets can be quite complex, often forming synaptic glomeruli, structures that not only include primary afferent axonal boutons and postsynaptic dendrites but also synaptic contacts with axons of neighboring interneurons. The presence of synaptic glomeruli allows for input modulation at the very first synapse within the dorsal horn and is thus thought to be the anatomical substrate for primary afferent presynaptic modulation. Within the dorsal horn, two main types of synaptic glomeruli have been described. Type I glomeruli are present largely in lamina II, have dark primary afferent axons, are thought to arise from unmeylinated fibers and axonal contacts that are GABA reactive, and are thought to arise from purely GABAergic interneurons.

05), slightly increasing the fraction of channels available for a

05), slightly increasing the fraction of channels available for activation from a given holding potential. Steady-state inactivation was similarly depolarized in distal dendrites (V1/2 = −68mV, k = −10, n = 16). In sum, our characterization of A-currents remaining in DPP6-KO dendritic recordings suggests a population of Kv4 channels that have lost DPP6 modulation. Because KChIP subunits prominently act to accelerate recovery from inactivation, it seems likely that at least a portion of the remaining Kv4 channels are

Torin 1 in vivo in complex with KChIP2, and possibly KChIP4, subunits. The difference in recovery rates between proximal (faster recovery) and distal dendrites (slower recovery) suggests the possibility that the expression of these Kv4-KChIP complexes may be more prominent in the

proximal dendrites in DPP6-KO CA1 neurons (see Discussion). Lack of an activation curve shift as well as the decrease in current density for DPP6 distal dendrites both act to substantially decrease the amount of transient current expected to be activated at a given membrane potential in DPP6-KO dendrites compared with WT controls. To investigate DPP6 influences on dendritic excitability in hippocampal CA1 neurons, we performed current clamp experiments in dendritic whole-cell recordings. In dendritic recordings from DPP6-KO mice, APs initiated via antidromic stimulation were better able to invade distal dendrites compared with WT (Figure 5A). Venetoclax Significant differences in bAP amplitude began at distances >100 μm from the soma, similar to the location where differences in A-current density between WT and DPP6-KO mice were observed all (Figure 5A). As an estimate of Na+ channel density, we measured the maximal rate of rise of APs in WT and DPP6-KO mice (Figures 5D and 5E). Finding no differences between the groups, and given that AP amplitude is predominately dependent on the permeability ratio of Na+ and K+ ions (Colbert et al., 1997), we conclude that DPP6 regulates AP back-propagation into CA1 dendrites by enhancing A-type K+ channel expression and regulating their properties to enhance channel open

probability. In CA1 neurons, AP back-propagation decreases with activity (Spruston et al., 1995) because of a combination of slow recovery from inactivation for dendritic Na+ channels and the activity of A-type K+ channels (Colbert et al., 1997 and Jung et al., 1997). To investigate activity-dependent AP back-propagation in DPP6-KO mice, trains of bAPs were evoked at three stimulus frequencies—10 Hz, 20 Hz, and 50 Hz—by antidromic stimulation and recorded ∼160 μm from the soma. In each of these trains, bAP amplitude progressively decreased in WT recordings such that the tenth AP amplitude was only 50%–60% that of the first (Figures 5B and 5C). However, DPP6-KO recordings showed a remarkable decrease in the amount of attenuation, particularly at the lower frequencies.

Furthermore, neurons generated from other strains of mice as well

Furthermore, neurons generated from other strains of mice as well as rats developed LB- and LN-like inclusions when treated with α-syn-hWT pffs, supporting the hypothesis

that induction of α-syn pathology is a general feature click here of primary rodent neurons (data not shown). P-α-syn-positive aggregates (as detected by 81A) did not form in astrocytes (Figure S1B). Moreover, the appearance of α-syn pathology required the presence of endogenous α-syn since α-syn-hWT pffs did not induce any pathology in primary neurons from α-syn −/− mice (Figure 1C). Furthermore, monomeric α-syn did not induce α-syn inclusions (data not shown), demonstrating that α-syn pffs alone seed the aggregates. Immunoblot analyses were conducted on neuron lysates sequentially

extracted with 1% Tx-100, followed by 2% SDS (Figure 1B). In contrast to PBS-treated neurons, those treated with α-syn-hWT pffs for 14 days showed > 80% reduction of α-syn in the Tx-100-soluble fraction accompanied by a concomitant appearance of α-syn in the SDS-extractable fraction. Immunoblots of the SDS-extractable fraction also showed insoluble p-α-syn. A mouse-specific anti-α-syn antibody did not detect α-syn-hWT pffs (Figure 1B, first lane on left), but detected bands in the neuron lysates similar to those labeled by the C terminus specific INCB024360 in vivo α-syn antibody and mAB 81A. In addition, higher-molecular-weight species of α-syn were detected in the SDS fraction of all α-syn pffs-treated cultures, and likely correspond to oligomeric and/or ubiquitinated α-syn (Li et al., 2005, Luk et al., 2009 and Sampathu et al., 2003). Sequential extractions of primary hippocampal neurons from α-syn −/− mice 14 days after addition of α-syn-hWT pffs confirmed the absence of pathological α-syn or any other species of immunoreactive α -syn (Figure S1C).

Thus, these data demonstrate that α-syn pffs induced recruitment of soluble endogenous α-syn into insoluble, hyperphosphorylated α-syn aggregates. Since α-syn is ubiquitinated in LBs and LNs, we studied α-syn aggregates that formed 14 days after addition of α-syn-hWT pffs and showed they were also ubiquitin Dipeptidyl peptidase positive (Figure 1D), and colocalized with p-α-syn. Because the exogenous α-syn-hWT pffs are not ubiquitinated or phosphorylated (Luk et al., 2009), these posttranslational modifications must occur intracellularly as endogenous mouse α-syn accumulates. Thus, these α-syn aggregates share hallmark features of PD-like LNs and LBs allowing us to conclude that misfolded α-syn pffs seed and recruit normal, endogenous α-syn to form pathologic aggregates. Previous in vitro studies have shown that recombinant α-syn protein lacking N- or C-terminal residues, or a synthetic peptide containing only the NAC domain (amino acid residues 61-95), assemble into α-syn amyloid fibrils, and nucleate full-length α-syn fibrillization (Giasson et al., 2001, Han et al.

All three missense mutations are predicted to damage the encoded

All three missense mutations are predicted to damage the encoded asparagine synthetase protein by available computer algorithms (SIFT and PolyPhen-2) and all three mutations are absent in dbSNP135, the 1,000 Genomes Project data set, and data from the NHLBI ESP (Table

2). To better estimate the frequency of the p.F362V variant in unaffected individuals, we directly genotyped this locus in 1,160 additional controls and failed to detect the mutation. Finally, all three mutations were genotyped in ancestry-matched controls and all remained absent (Table 2), with the exception of p.F362V, which has an estimated carrier frequency of 0.0125 in Iranian Jews. Additionally, we used the sequence data to test for evidence of cryptic relatedness between

the patient in family A and the affected siblings from family B and found no indication of elevated identity by descent beyond what is expected for unrelated www.selleckchem.com/products/cb-839.html genomes (data not shown). We also tested whether the p.F362V ASNS variant is found on a common haplotype in all affected individuals of Iranian Jewish origin. Indeed, the ASNS variant was found on the same 1.2 Mb haplotype in both families and this haplotype was very rare (0.8%) in 261 sequenced controls ( Supplemental Experimental Procedures; Table S6). This observation is consistent with a single founder origin for p.F362V and subsequent transmission see more along with the same extended haplotype. We also did not find evidence for homozygote deletions overlapping the ASNS gene in controls ( Supplemental Experimental Procedures). Interestingly, the mutation p.R550C was found in two families of different ethnic backgrounds. This mutation was associated with different haplotypes

in each of these families, suggesting that it arose independently. It should be noted that p.R550C corresponds to a CpG site, which is associated with a higher mutation rate (Nachman and Crowell, 2000), possibly explaining the recurrence of this rare mutation in different populations. To test the effect of the identified mutations on ASNS mRNA Mephenoxalone and protein levels, we generated full-length mutant cDNA constructs (p.A6E, p.F362V, and p.R550C) using PCR-mediated site-directed mutagenesis (Figure S2). We then transfected both wild-type and mutant alleles into HEK293 and COS-7 cells and found similarly robust levels of expression of the mRNA corresponding to wild-type and all three mutant alleles (Figure 3A). This result indicates that these mutations do not overtly affect mRNA levels, suggesting that they do not influence mRNA stability. For the p.F362V mutation, we also compared wild-type and mutant full-length transcripts, from the patient fibroblasts, to detect any differences in alternative splicing or exon skipping and found no evidence for alternately spliced transcripts (data not shown). We used two approaches to detect the ASNS protein in transfected cells. First, we used an antibody to human ASNS (Figure S2).

A key issue, therefore, is whether the NMDAR content is altered a

A key issue, therefore, is whether the NMDAR content is altered at individual synapses. We first addressed this functionally, by collecting mixed spontaneous AMPAR- and NMDAR-mediated find more currents at −70 mV in the absence of external Mg2+, then washing on APV and collecting the pure AMPAR-mediated currents. The pure AMPAR currents were then subtracted from the mixed currents to give a pure NMDAR-mediated spontaneous current. We performed these experiments using simultaneously recorded NLGN1 miR-expressing neurons and neighboring control cells in the dentate gyrus and collected both evoked and spontaneous currents, using the evoked currents to assess the validity

of the technique. The stimulation-evoked, subtracted NMDAR-mediated currents in NLGN1 miR expressing cells were reduced, as expected, compared to control cells (Figures 2A and 2B).

Moreover, the magnitude of the reduction was identical to that found when NMDAR currents were measured at +40 mV in the previous experiment (as percent selleck chemicals llc of control, +40 mV, 32.12 ± 5.26; subtracted 23.4 ± 4.92; p > 0.05), thus providing validation of the technique. Furthermore, neither the charge transfer of the NMDAR current as a percent of the total charge transfer of the mixed AMPAR/NMDAR current nor the kinetics of the NMDAR current were altered in the evoked Rutecarpine response (Figures 2C and 2D). We next analyzed the spontaneous currents in these same cells (Figure 2E) and found a dramatic reduction in the frequency of spontaneous events (Figure 2F), but no

change in amplitude of either the mixed current, the pure AMPAR current, or the pure, subtracted NMDAR current (Figure 2G). Like the evoked current, knockdown did not affect the percentage of spontaneous charge transfer accounted for by NMDA current (Figure 2H). We consequently conclude that the reduction in evoked NMDAR currents is functionally due to an all-or-none loss of synapses, while the remaining synapses have normal numbers of NMDARs. To complement the functional evidence for an all-or-none loss of synapses following neuroligin knockdown, we examined spine density. Following knockdown of NLGN1, we filled transduced dentate granule cells and neighboring control cells with fluorescent dye and imaged their dendrites (Figure 2I). We observed a reduction in spine density in NLGN1 miR expressing cells as compared to control (Figure 2J) of a similar magnitude to the reduction in evoked currents. Spine density in dentate granule cells following the knockdown of NLGN3 was also reduced, confirming that synaptic loss is a general response to neuroligin knockdown (Figures S2A and S2B). Finally, we performed a coefficient of variation analysis on the paired evoked recordings following neuroligin knockdown.

, 2010, Eden et al , 2002, Kobayashi et al , 1998, Schenck et al

, 2010, Eden et al., 2002, Kobayashi et al., 1998, Schenck et al., 2003 and Steffen et al., 2004). Rearrangements of the Regorafenib clinical trial actin cytoskeleton strongly influence the formation, retraction, motility, stability, and shape of the dendritic spines (Tada and Sheng, 2006), and genetic ablation of WRC components affects spine morphology and excitability (Grove et al., 2004, Kim et al., 2006, Soderling et al., 2007 and Wiens et al., 2005). However, the interplay of this process with other events regulating

spine function, such as local translation, is still unknown. Here, we demonstrate that active Rac1 changes the equilibrium between two distinct CYFIP1 complexes, activating the translation of mRNAs important Fulvestrant for synaptic structure and function, such as Arc/Arg3.1 mRNA. This switch occurs through a conformational change in CYFIP1, detectable by Förster resonance energy transfer (FRET). Knockdown of Cyfip1 or mutations in the regions interacting with eIF4E or WRC produce dendritic spine defects resembling those found in FXS and other synaptopathies.

These findings shed light on the molecular mechanisms that tune the balance between translational control and actin remodeling at synapses. The identification of interaction partners of CYFIP1 suggests that neurological disorders characterized by spine dysmorphogenesis might be due to perturbations in the balance between these two CYFIP1 interconnected pathways. To dissect the CYFIP1 function and its possible crosstalk with the FMRP-eIF4E translational complex and the actin-regulatory complex WRC, we investigated the structural organization of the two CYFIP1 complexes. According

to the crystal structure of the WRC that includes CYFIP1 (Chen et al., 2010), NCKAP1 interacts with CYFIP1 over a large surface (Figure 1A, upper panel); the lysine critical for the binding to eIF4E L-NAME HCl (Lys743) (Napoli et al., 2008) is covered by NCKAP1 and therefore is not accessible to solvent when CYFIP1 is in the WRC (Figure 1A, bottom panels, Table S1). These structural data indicate that the same CYFIP1 molecule cannot simultaneously interact with the WRC and eIF4E. Synapses are severely affected in FXS and other neurological disorders (Fiala et al., 2002, Penzes et al., 2011 and Valnegri et al., 2012). Electron microscopy (EM) and biochemical studies revealed that CYFIP1, at synapses, is enriched in postsynaptic compartments (Figure S1 available online). In mouse cortical synaptoneurosomes, CYFIP1 coimmunoprecipitates with FMRP, eIF4E, NCKAP1, and WAVE1 (Figure 1B). Furthermore, immunoprecipitation of NCKAP1 revealed the presence of CYFIP1 but not eIF4E, whereas immunoprecipitation of the eIF4E complex detected CYFIP1 but not NCKAP1 (Figure 1C). We conclude that CYFIP1 engages in two distinct complexes. Synaptic activity leads to an increase of protein synthesis as well as actin remodeling (Bramham, 2008).

We also investigated the hypothesis that the

proximity si

We also investigated the hypothesis that the

proximity signal contributes in some integral way to the computation of the movement trajectory. To do so, we asked whether the faithful encoding of proximity selleck compound in single neurons was associated with shorter path lengths or more efficient locomotor behavior on a trial-by-trial basis. As detailed in the Supplemental Information, no such association was found, suggesting that NAc cue-evoked excitations contribute little to the actual navigational computations necessary to carry out flexible approach. Stimuli that predict the availability of reward can elicit vigorous reward-seeking behavior. This sensory-motor transformation requires that reward-predictive

cues activate neurons that promote reward seeking and encode the Navitoclax order features of the upcoming movement. Our results identify just such a neural mechanism in the NAc: a large fraction of neurons (46%) were excited by a reward-predictive tone, and these neurons encoded the vigor of the subsequent approach to a locomotor target. They showed greater firing in response to the tone that predicted reward compared to a nonpredictive tone, the firing preceded the initiation of locomotion, and the firing was greater on trials in which the locomotion began at shorter latency and occurred at faster speed. Moreover, cue-evoked firing was greater when the animal was closer to the lever at cue onset, and this proximity signal appeared to mediate the tendency of the subjects

to initiate locomotion sooner when closer to the lever. These results strongly suggest that the NAc’s role in invigoration of cued reward seeking (Cardinal et al., 2002) is due to cue-evoked, premotor firing that promotes the initiation of a short-latency approach response. Previous behavioral the studies lend strong support to this conclusion. Disruption of dopamine transmission in the NAc profoundly impairs performance on this task, a deficit that is directly attributable to a slowed latency to initiate locomotion toward the goal (Nicola, 2010). Furthermore, inactivation of the VTA (which innervates the NAc with dopamine-containing axons) selectively eliminates the cue-evoked firing of NAc neurons in similar tasks (Cacciapaglia et al., 2011; Yun et al., 2004). It is therefore apparent that the NAc neuronal activity that requires dopamine (cue-evoked excitation) robustly encodes the feature of locomotion (latency to initiate) that is most severely impaired when NAc dopamine function is disrupted. The most parsimonious interpretation is that the neural correlates of locomotor invigoration we observed in this study are not mere correlations but directly promote vigorous reward seeking.

Mice P13–23 were urethane-anesthetized (1 2 g/kg), and a small (1

Mice P13–23 were urethane-anesthetized (1.2 g/kg), and a small (1–2 mm) cranial window was created over the barrel cortex. All in vivo experimental procedures were in accordance with national regulation and institutional guidelines and follow previously described methods (Crochet and Petersen, 2006 and Glazewski et al., 2007). Juxtacellular, loose patch recordings

were performed with glass microelectrodes. Internal solution contained 50 μm Alexa 594 for shadow patching (Kitamura et al., 2008). For imaging, the laser was Nutlin-3a mouse tuned to 930 nm for GFP visualization or 820 nm for Alexa 594 emission during electrode positioning. To verify that electrodes could detect APs from a target, cells were only included in the analysis if they fired at least once during the recording period. Firing rates were calculated over ∼300+ s. Coronal or thalamocortical brain slices (350 μm thick) from mice P12–P15 (wild-type C57Bl6, fosGFP heterozygotes, or arcGFP heterozygotes) were prepared. Slices were recovered in regular ACSF at 35°C for 30 min

and maintained at room temperature in low-divalent ACSF (0.5 mM MgSO4, 1 mM CaCl2, 3.5 mM KCl). Spiny, pyramidal layer 2/3 neurons in primary somatosensory cortex were targeted for recording based upon fosGFP+/− expression. Internal pipette solution contained a K-gluconate internal solution (Supplemental Experimental Procedures). Because the whole-cell recording configuration unambiguously indicated that a single neuron was targeted for Ibrutinib molecular weight recording, pairs in which one cell did not exhibit any firing (0 Hz) were included in analysis of whole-cell recordings. APs were elicited by injection of minimal current (using 20, 60, 80 pA steps), and trials that yielded a single AP were used for analysis. AP threshold, peak, and half-width (threshold to peak) were determined using custom-written Igor Pro macros. Spontaneous firing activity was collected where Vrest was maintained at −50 mV to normalize differences in resting potential between cells, a technique that did not appreciably alter firing

rates (data not shown). Onset and offset of synchronized network activity were determined using membrane potential mean and standard deviation over 500 ms, with a 10 ms sliding Mannose-binding protein-associated serine protease window (Gerkin et al., 2010). Cells were maintained at their normal resting potential, which was approximately −60 mV, the experimentally determined reversal potential for Cl−. One cell was assigned as the trigger cell and a series of 10 pulses (500 pA, 5 ms duration) at 20 Hz were delivered across 20 separate trials. Bidirectional connectivity was assessed sequentially for each pair. Spontaneous EPSP frequency was calculated in the 500 ms time window preceding the stimulus, and evoked EPSP frequency was calculated across the 10-pulse series including 50 ms after the last pulse (500 ms total).