The role of lymphatic obstruction may relate to the inability to clear the pathogen. Venous insufficiency may also cause “venous eczema” or stasis dermatitis which could disrupt the cutaneous barrier. More obvious breaches in the form of stasis ulcers are also possible. The role

of obesity may be difficult to separate from edema since the two often go hand in hand. Adipose tissue, however, can compress lymphatic channels and impair lymphatic PF-3084014 ic50 flow. Obesity may also increase skin fragility and decrease hygiene levels [13]. Groups A, B, C, and G streptococci and Staphylococcus aureus are considered to be the most common etiologic agents of cellulitis [3, 13, 15, 16]. Depending on extenuating factors, other microbes can cause cellulitis. These include Vibrio and Aeromonas species associated with exposure to marine and freshwater environments, respectively, Pasteurella multocida associated with carnivore (especially cat) bites, Pseudomonas aeruginosa associated with neutropenia, and Erysipelothrix rhusiopathiae associated with the handling of seafood or meat. Cryptococcus neoformans may cause cellulitis in patients with defective cell-mediated immunity [3, 13, 15, 16, 25]. Biopsy of skin with cellulitis has shown dilated lymphatics and capillaries, marked dermal edema, and Vorinostat chemical structure primarily neutrophilic infiltration, either diffusely within the dermis

or concentrated around vessels [13]. The Androgen Receptor Antagonist purchase bacterial burden from central and peripheral biopsy is usually low suggesting an exaggerated inflammatory response to low concentrations of microorganisms or possibly their export products [26]. It has been suggested that exotoxins elaborated by streptococci or staphylococci are really the primary mediators of inflammation. This theory proposes that immune responses to exotoxins are responsible for most of the tissue effects seen in cellulitis as opposed to direct cytotoxic effects of the exotoxins. In other words, the exotoxin would function as a superantigen [13, Buspirone HCl 27]. Culture Etiology

Most cases of cellulitis are not amenable to identification of a pathogen [3, 7, 13, 15]. Microbiological cultures are usually negative for the majority of cases in which cultures are performed [8]. A study of quantitative cultures of biopsy specimens from cutaneous cellulitis found that only 28.5% and 18% of needle aspiration and punch biopsy cultures were positive, respectively [26]. Other studies have shown blood cultures were even less likely to be positive with yields <5% [28–30]. Slightly higher yields (up to 7–10%) have been reported for patients who had not previously received antimicrobial therapy [13]. As a result, cultures of non-suppurative cellulitis are rarely formed, and treatment is informed by expert guidelines and clinical judgment. Positive blood cultures are most commonly associated with streptococci [12, 13, 15].