The Journal regrets this error. “
“Due to an oversight, the authors omitted follow-up data from the article titled, “Squamous Odontogenic Tumor-like Proliferations in Radicular Cysts: A Clinicopathologic Study of Forty-two Cases,”" by Rinku M. Parmar, Robert B. Brannon, and Craig B. Fowler, buy LDN-193189 which was published in J Endod 2011;37:623–6. In the article, this data should follow the section, “Histopathologic Features.” The missing text appears below. Follow-up information was available for 11 cases. The range of follow-up was 1 month to 10 years, and the average length of follow-up was 2.5 years. There were no recurrences or unexpected clinical
behavior reported among the 11 cases with follow-up. “
“Microbial control is paramount in clinical endodontics 1 and 2.
Among the treatment steps, chemomechanical procedures play a pivotal role in eliminating or reducing bacterial populations from the main root canal, but the disinfecting effects of instruments and irrigants may be somewhat hampered in cases with complex anatomy. A clear example includes the cross-sectional root canal configuration, which has been classified as round, oval, long oval, flattened, or irregular (3). Oval, long oval, and flattened canals are those presenting a ratio between the maximum and minimum cross-sectional diameter of less than 2:1, 2 to 4:1, and greater than 4:1, respectively (3). Numerous studies have reported that hand and rotary instrumentation of
Selleckchem LBH589 oval-shaped canals leaves unprepared buccal and lingual extensions or recesses 4, 5, 6, 7, 8 and 9, which can harbor remnants of necrotic pulp tissue and bacterial biofilms. Moreover, recesses can be packed with dentin debris generated and pushed therein by rotating instruments (10). Residual biofilms and infected debris can serve as a potential source of Carnitine palmitoyltransferase II persistent infection and treatment failure (11). Some approaches have been suggested to deal with the problem of cleaning and disinfecting oval canals. Ultrasonic instrumentation (12) and a combination of rotary nickel-titanium (NiTi) instruments and hand instrumentation with a modified Hedström file were reported to improve the preparation (13), but no technique completely cleaned oval-shaped canals. A histologic study (8) reported that preparation with hand Hedström files and another two techniques (anatomic endodontic technology and rotary NiTi instruments) failed to completely prepare and clean oval canals. Another recent study (7) evaluated the prepared surface areas of oval-shaped canals using four different instrumentation techniques: Hedström files in circumferential filing, ProTaper NiTi rotaries considering the oval canal as 1 canal, ProTaper considering buccal and lingual aspects of the oval canal as 2 individual canals, and ProTaper in a circumferential filing motion.