The aim of this study was to test the correlation between clinical factors and outcome, based on patients seen in a single institute.
Methods: Thirty patients with pathologically confirmed adult-type GCTs between 1984 and 2010 were reviewed retrospectively. Among them, eight (26.7%) had recurrence, which subsequently contributed to two mortalities.
Results: In a comparison of the clinical characteristics of the premenopausal and postmenopausal women with GCT, all of the postmenopausal women had symptoms (100% vs. 63.6%, p = 0.01). With regard to disease recurrence, only abnormal preoperative serum cancer antigen 125 level (>= 35 U/mL) check details was significant
(50% vs. 11%, p = 0.03), and residual tumor showed a borderline trend (100% vs. 21.4%, p = 0.06). Other factors, including International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics stage, tumor size, tumor rupture prior to or during operation,
body mass index, parity, serum estrogen level, and adjuvant therapy, were not statistically significant.
Conclusion: Physicians should be alert to the difference in the symptom presentation of GCTs between pre- and postmenopausal women, giving particular attention to the usefulness of the preoperative serum level of cancer antigen 125 in patients with GCTs. More evidence is needed to confirm this observation. Copyright (C) 2013 Elsevier Taiwan LLC and the Chinese Medical Association. All GW4064 rights reserved.”
“Follow-up is critical to the success of laparoscopic adjustable gastric
banding (LAGB). Few data guide this and expected norms of satiety, adverse symptoms, and outcomes have not been defined.
Consecutive patients, who underwent LAGB, were evaluated using a newly developed instrument that assessed satiety, adverse upper gastrointestinal EPZ5676 (dysphagia, reflux, and epigastric pain), and outcomes (overall satisfaction, weight loss, and quality of life (SF-36)).
Three hundred twenty-three of 408 patients responded (80%; mean age 44.4 +/- 11.8 years, 56 males). Excess weight loss was 52%. Satiety was greater at breakfast compared to lunch (5.3 +/- 1.9 vs. 4.1 +/- 1.7, p < 0.005) or dinner (3.8 +/- 1.8, p < 0.005). The satisfaction score was 8.3 +/- 2.1 out of 10, and 91% would have the surgery again. Quality of life was less than community norms, except in physical functioning (83.4 +/- 20.5 vs. 84.7 +/- 22.0, p = 0.25) and bodily pain (78.4 +/- 15.2 vs. 75.9 +/- 25.3, p = 0.004). Inability to consume certain foods was cited as the biggest problem by 66% of respondents. The dysphagia score was 19.9 +/- 8.7; softer foods were tolerated, although difficulty was noted with firmer foods. The reflux score was 8.7 +/- 9.8 and regurgitation occurred a mean of once per week. Weight loss and the mental component score were the only predictors of overall satisfaction (r (2) = 0.46, p = 0.01).