\n\nResult: Thirty-four patients were proven to have bone metastases based on positive bone scintigraphy result. None of these patients had a PSA level of less than 10 ng/ml. Two patients had PSA level between 11 and 20, and 15 patients had PSA level between 21 and 200. For patients with PSA level over 201, 17 had bone metastases on bone scintigraphy.\n\nConclusion:

Based on the PSA level, the likelihood of positive bone scintigraphy result can be postulated. According to PSA levels, staging investigations can be more selective for patients with confirmed CaP. The risk of having positive bone scan is so low that it is not required for patients with PSA level less than 10 ng/ml. On the other hand, on studying the correlation Bcl 2 inhibitor between Gleason score and PSA level or bone scan results, Vactosertib supplier no statistically significant relationship was established. (C) 2011 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.”
“Metastasis of

uterine leiomyosarcoma to the pancreas is rare. A 46-year-old woman was diagnosed with uterine leiomyosarcoma and underwent surgery. Thereafter, recurrences in the lung and subsequently in the pancreas were diagnosed. These lesions were resected and diagnosed as metastasis of uterine leiomyosarcoma. We report a rare case of uterine leiomyosarcoma with metastasis to the lung and pancreas, both of which were resected using aggressive surgery.”
“Intra-articular corticosteroid injections (IACI) are one of the mainstays of treatment for children with juvenile idiopathic arthritis. The

most important disadvantage of IACI is the pain associated with the procedure. Little is known about the children or parents’ perception of this pain. This study was undertaken to determine whether patients and their parents prefer sedation to receive IACI or not and why. A survey form was presented to patients and/or their parents from January to March 2010 to evaluate their choice of anesthesiologist-controlled deep sedation (with sevoflurane) vs. no sedation-no BEZ235 solubility dmso local anesthesia and the reasons for it. All participants had experienced the two options. In addition, there were two visual analog scales (VAS) to evaluate pain associated with blood draws and IACI, respectively. A total of 45 patients and their parents filled out the survey form. There were 34 females; the median age was 10.6 years, and the median duration of the disease was 6.4 years. Median VAS score was 1.3 for pain associated with blood draws, and 6, for IACI. Most children preferred sedation for IACI (26 vs. 15), although four did not show preference for either method. Children who preferred sedation for IACI were younger (p = 0.03) and had a shorter course of disease (p = 0.04). Conclusions: While most children prefer to receive IACI under sedation, a majority of parents prefer to avoid its risks. Children who prefer IACI without sedation are significantly older and have a longer course of disease.