However, the feasibility of large-scale multisite studies using c

However, the feasibility of large-scale multisite studies using cognitive remediation at clinical trials sites has not been established.\n\nMethod: 53 adult patients with DSM-IV schizophrenia from 9 university-affiliated sites were randomized to a cognitive remediation condition that included the Posit Science Brain Fitness auditory training program with weekly Neuropsychological

and Educational Approach to Remediation (NEAR) “bridging groups” or a control condition of computer games and weekly healthy lifestyles groups. Patients were expected to complete 3 to 5 one-hour selleck inhibitor sessions weekly for 40 sessions or 12 weeks, whichever came first. The primary outcomes were feasibility results as measured by rate of enrollment, retention, and completion rate of primary outcome measures. The study was conducted from July 2009 through January 2010.\n\nResults: During a find protocol 3-month enrollment period, 53 (of a projected 54) patients were enrolled, and 41 (77%) met criteria for study completion. Thirty-one patients completed all 40 sessions, and all patients completed all primary outcome measures. Preliminary efficacy results indicated that, after 20 sessions, patients in the cognitive remediation condition demonstrated mean MATRICS Consensus Cognitive Battery

composite score improvements that were 3.7(95% CI, 0.05-7.34) T-score points greater than in patients in the computer-games control group (F-1,F-46=4.16, P=.047). At the end of treatment, a trend favoring cognitive remediation was not statistically significant (F-1,F-47=2.26, P=.14).\n\nConclusion: Multisite clinical trials of cognitive

remediation using the Posit Science Brain Fitness auditory training program with the NEAR ABT-263 Apoptosis inhibitor method of weekly bridging groups at traditional clinical sites appear to be feasible.”
“Introduction and hypothesis Comparison of the modifications of the Viennese method of manual perineal protection (VMPP) and hands-off delivery techniques by applying basic principles of mechanics with assessments of tensions within perineal structures using a novel biomechanical model of the perineum. Evaluation of the role of the precise placements of the accoucheur’s posterior (dominant) thumb and index finger in perineal tissue tension when performing a modified Viennese method of MPP. Methods We carried out an experimental study on a biomechanical model of the perineum at NTIS (New Technologies for Information Society, Pilsen, Czech Republic). Hands-off and 38 variations of VMPP were simulated during vaginal delivery with the finite element model imitating a clinical lithotomy position. Results The main outcome measures were quantity and extent of strain/tension throughout the perineal body during vaginal delivery. Stress distribution between modifications of VMPP showed a wide variation in peak perineal tension from 72 to 102 % compared with 100 % for the “hands-off” technique.

Comments are closed.