Cognitive interviewing, a qualitative method used find to out how respondents understand and answer structured questions was used to improve the validity

and acceptability of items [26] and [27]. Men and women aged 18+ were recruited if they had a health condition or cared for someone who had a health condition. Participants were purposely selected to reflect a spectrum of health conditions and carers and were asked to spend 10–15 min browsing a relevant health website. A spectrum of website providers were incorporated: government websites (for example, NHS Choices), charity websites (for example, Health Talk Online) and commercial websites (for example, BootsWebMD). Websites were chosen to ensure the items were tested with experiential content and ‘facts and figures’ content. Websites were also chosen to incorporate features such Selleck Trichostatin A as discussion boards, video clips and ratings. The ‘verbal probing’ method of cognitive interviewing was used giving respondents an opportunity to provide uninterrupted answers to the items, followed by a focused

interview [26] and [28]. This method of interviewing queried a participant’s understanding of an item and their interpretation of the instructions and response options [20]. Items were checked for consistency of interpretation between participants and across health groups. Reoccurring problems with specific items or wording were highlighted. Analysis was carried out throughout the interview process so that problems CDK inhibitor identified could be revised and retested. Interviews were conducted until it was thought all potential problems with questionnaire completion had been identified,

revised and retested. The HERG interview archive has approval from the interview respondents for secondary analysis. Ethical approval was obtained for cognitive testing through the University of Oxford Ethics Committee. Ninety-nine participants, 28 (28.3%) men and 71 (71.7%) women, were included in the sample. All had used the internet in relation to a health issue. With the exception of four interviews conducted with couples and one interview with three Methamphetamine young women, interviews were conducted on a one-to-one basis. Participants ranged from 15 to 80 years old and had a mean age of 35.0 years (SD 16.9). Carers accounted for 30.3% of the participants interviewed whilst the remaining 69.7% were interviewed about their own health. Of those who reported their ethnicity (n = 75), 90.7% were white. Table 1 shows further detail. Participants within the sample reported accessing health websites intermittently; frequency of use peaked according to key health events (such as diagnosis, or progression of an illness). Participants had used different resources (including conventional health websites, health discussion forums and blogs) and often combined the information they found online with advice from health care professionals.