001] demonstrated

a similar pattern of greater SC deficit with abstract categorization rules [t(14.5) = 4.68, p < .001]. Results remained unchanged for the frontal lesion group also as the overall interaction term indicating a differential switch impairment with categorization but not naming rules compared to controls remained significant [F(1, 24) = 7, p = .01], as did their elevated SC with categorization rules [t(15.98) = 2.73, p = .02]. Error rates were very low (less than 4%). There were no group differences overall [F(3, 46) = 1.18, p = .33], and no main effects or group interactions were significant (all F < 1). There were no differences in error SC as a function of rule type [Rule × Trial type × Group: F(3, 46) = 1.04, p = .39]. To our knowledge, this is the first neuropsychological EGFR inhibitor study to demonstrate that frontal cortical involvement in task switching depends on whether a switch of task engenders a reconfiguration in the rule governing response assignment. As predicted,

the frontal lesion group demonstrated a specific SC deficit when switching between abstract categorization rules, which selleck chemical required reconfiguration to a rule giving rise to a new set of responses, but no such impairment was seen when these patients switched between naming rules pertaining to stimulus selection: on such a switch, only stimulus sets but not response sets were reconfigured as the superordinate response rule of target vocalization governing the mapping between stimuli medchemexpress and responses remained the same. This finding is key to interpreting the profiles of switching in PD at different stages of the disease. The current frontal lesion group was selected on the basis of strict criteria depending on the extent of cortical damage,

which was mostly lateral and, critically, the exclusion of basal ganglia damage. Previous studies have associated lesions of the frontal lobe with basic task switching deficits as well as more global impairments of working memory and verbal fluency. Although the frontally compromised group showed elevated RT overall in both rule conditions, they demonstrated intact switching between naming rules and, remarkably, normal performance on the background neuropsychological tests. This preserved neuropsychological profile serves to highlight their specific rule reconfiguration deficit. Thus, the requirement for response rule reconfiguration isolates at least one contribution of the frontal cortex to task switching. With respect to the first aim of this study, the case for intact and impaired switching profiles in PD as a function of cortical pathology with abstract categorization rules (Kehagia et al., 2009) is strengthened by the current replication. Paralleling the frontal group deficit, medicated HY stage II PD patients were impaired at switching when it involved reconfiguration of the response rule, while patients at stage I of the disease demonstrated intact switching.