The heating effect of an RF magnetic field was analyzed in our previous papers. In this paper, we analyze the role of the RF electric field which may cause field emission from a microparticle. Our consideration is restricted by ellipsoidal metallic particles. It is shown that the heating effect becomes significant

when such microparticles have a needlelike shape, and therefore, the electric field amplification at the ends is high. In this case, the field-emitted current may cause the heating of the microparticles. The heating in single shots and in repetition-rate regimes is studied for the case of the combined effect of both the RF magnetic and electric fields.”
“Objectives\n\nIn keeping with the current emphasis on quality improvement and patient safety, a Canadian division of general internal medicine began holding weekly NCT-501 manufacturer morbidity and mortality rounds

(M&MRs) with postgraduate trainees. Grounded in the medical education and social sciences literatures about such rounds, we sought to explore the teaching and learning processes that occur in M&MRs in order to understand their role in, and contribution to, the current medical education context.\n\nMethods\n\nWe conducted selleck chemicals llc an ethnography of these M&MRs. We observed the rounds, conducted interviews with both staff doctors and residents and triangulated the resultant data. Concurrent, iterative data collection and analysis enabled sampling to saturation.\n\nResults\n\nStaff doctors had differing understandings of the role of M&MRs and valued different kinds of teaching. They did not think they were teaching medical content knowledge at these rounds, but rather

that they were role-modelling six skills, attitudes and behaviours, including ‘identifying and addressing 3-Methyladenine order process and systems issues affecting care’. Residents primarily wanted to learn content knowledge and tried to extract such knowledge out of the rounds. They did recognise and value that they were learning about process and systems issues. They also agreed that staff doctors were role-modelling other things, but had varying perceptions of what those were; most did not value this role-modelled learning as much as they valued the acquisition of content knowledge.\n\nConclusions\n\nThese M&MRs were effective forums for addressing patient safety and quality improvement competencies. They carried none of the negative functions attributed to such rounds in the sociology literature, focusing neither on absolving responsibility nor on learning socially acceptable ways to discuss death in public. However, this study revealed a marked disjunction between the teaching valued by staff doctors and the learning valued by their trainees.