Plate waste data collection Rapamycin ic50 took place each day, for five consecutive days (Monday through Friday) at each school in November or December of 2011. At each school, all lunch periods were observed. Waste data were collected only for students who chose to eat in the primary eating areas immediately adjacent to the cafeteria food line. Food production records were abstracted from administrative databases housed at the LAUSD. Data on food production are recorded by staff working in the school cafeteria and reported to the FSB using a

standardized template. The following data fields were requested from LAUSD for this study: school, service date, service period (breakfast, snack or lunch), and a description and number of each food item (e.g., entrée, side, drink) projected, prepared, added, served and left over. Cisplatin molecular weight The goal of the plate waste assessment was to measure the amount of fruit, vegetable, and milk waste that remained on students’ trays after they finished their school lunch. This

analysis focuses on fruit and vegetable waste only. Prior to the first lunch period, the plate waste evaluation team obtained and recorded information from the cafeteria manager about the day’s fruit and vegetable menu choices, including the names of the food items served (stock description) and their mean weights (5 samples for each item were weighed) as served (including container weight). Any entrée with more than 50% vegetables by weight (according to the school food service director) was included as a vegetable choice. When students entered out the lunch line, a unique, arbitrary study identification number was placed on each tray and a member of the evaluation team observed and recorded the students’ sex and race/ethnicity (coded as African American, Asian/Pacific Islander, Latino, white, or other). As students left the cafeteria they were instructed (through signage and public announcements) to leave all remaining/uneaten food items on their tray and deposit their tray at one of two staffed stations at opposite ends of the primary eating area. Once

the majority of students had dropped off their trays, one team member at each station visually inspected each tray and recorded: the assigned identification number; the number of items that the student took (based on the presence of packaging or waste); and the amount of waste. Based on visual inspection, fruit and vegetable waste was recorded as: a) no evidence of the food component on the plate (i.e., that the student had not selected that food item); b) none (wrapper only or fruit residues (e.g. apple core)); c) one-quarter remaining; d) one half remaining; e) three quarters remaining; or f) all remaining. Using the study identification numbers, the demographic data observed at the start of the lunch period were linked with the observed plate waste data recorded at the end of the lunch period.